Alpine huts by country

The same daily reading, counted per country. Coverage is uneven between them, and this page says where it is thin rather than averaging that away.

3,345huts mapped
616publish a calendar we read
8countries
Country Huts mapped Calendars read Share Regions
Italy 1,174 77 7% 31
Austria 682 169 25% 12
Switzerland 562 186 33% 21
France 490 76 16% 36
Germany 183 50 27% 3
Slovenia 128 0 0% 1
Spain 82 25 30% 2
Sweden 44 33 75% 1

Where the reading is thin

Coverage is not even, and these are the cases where a low share means something a reader should know before trusting a count.

Why coverage differs by country

Alpine huts are not a chain. They are run by national clubs, regional sections, local authorities, families and individual wardens, across six countries and four main languages, and each of them solved booking when it got round to it.

The result is that whether a hut's availability can be read at all is mostly a question of which portal its owner uses. Where a national club runs one central reservation system, coverage is good. Where huts book by phone, by email, or through a site with no public calendar, the hut is still mapped and routable but its beds cannot be counted.

So the figures below are not a ranking of the countries. They are a map of where the booking systems happen to be readable.

How to read the table

Huts mapped counts huts with a page on this site, each counted once even where our region packs overlap. Calendars read counts those whose own booking system publishes availability we read daily.

A country's country is resolved per hut, from the hut's own dialling code and booking domain, rather than from the region pack it is routed in. Several packs cross a border, so counting by pack would file Slovenian huts as Italian and Swiss huts as French.